WHEN AI BECOMES THE DEFENDANT: THE JUDGE’S QUANDARY
INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence is moving beyond assisting human decision-makers to making decisions on its own. In the situation considered here, the system does not merely recommend, rank, score, flag or predict an outcome for a human to accept or reject. It makes the operative decision itself, without human review . When such a decision is challenged in court, a familiar judicial problem takes an unfamiliar form. The institution that deployed the system may still be the defendant, but no human actor made or approved the decision under challenge. This is the sense in which AI becomes the subject of litigation : not because the system acquires legal personality or literally becomes a defendant, but because the court must determine whether its decision can be understood, tested and justified sufficiently to withstand scrutiny under the rule of law . The difficulty is practical. When a decision affects a person’s rights, obligations or interests, that person may chal...